Original Article Electrodiagnostic referrals at a tertiary center

Electrodiagnostic referrals at a tertiary center

Authors

  • Alika Sharma Bombay Hospital and MRC
  • Priyanka Chavan
  • K A Mansukhani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.bhj.162

Abstract

Introduction:

Electrodiagnostic studies are used for the diagnosis of various lower motor neuron disorders. A set of necessary tests are performed for exact localization of disease. The aim of this study is to assess the frequency of the different lower motor neuron diseases and to see how many patients require follow up EDx studies for different conditions.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective study and data of consecutive patients assessed in our EDx laboratory in the years 2021 and 2022 were included. Data was included as number of cases with a final EDx diagnosis. Total number of cases of each type were entered month wise with the total number of cases of each EDx diagnosis as inferred after the test.

Results:

In the year 2021, a total of 2732 patients were tested for EMG and EPs in the EDx laboratory. In the year 2022, 3425 patients were tested. The maximum number of patients (905) had normal EDx findings. The most common abnormal diagnosis included traumatic nerve / plexus injuries (668), closely followed by upper / lower limb radiculopathies (645). Somatosensory evoked potential studies for assessing posterior column conduction defects formed the next large referral (598). 478 patients underwent follow up studies followed by Carpal tunnel syndrome (357) and Diabetic peripheral neuropathies (347). Also, a special mention of 130 cases of EMG guided laryngeal botulinum toxin injections for patients with spasmodic dysphonia where the injection is given by Laryngologist /Voice surgeon.

Conclusion:

To conclude, in our study, the order of electrodiagnostic outcome is normal study followed by peripheral neuropathies, followed by traumatic neuropathies / plexopathies and somatosensory evoked potential studies over the course of 2 years in a total of 6157 patients. Our study reports the maximum percentage of normal EDx findings as consistent with other studies. Most other studies have reported polyneuropathy, entrapment neuropathy, and disorders of the motor nerve root and plexus as the most common reasons for electrodiagnostic requests(19,20). The large number of SSEP referrals as in our laboratory, have not been studied at other centres as reviewed. The strength of our study  is 1) the large sample size even though the study has been done only at one centre, and, 2)  the maintenance of accurate records.

References

Katirji B. The clinical electromyography examination. An

overview. Neurol Clin 2002;20:291-303.

Fuller G. How to get the most out of nerve conduction studies and

electromyography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:ii41-6.

Bodofsky EB, Carter GT, England JD. Is electrodiagnostic testing

for polyneuropathy overutilized? Muscle Nerve 2017;55:301-4.

McKnight JT, Adcock BB. Paresthesias: A practical diagnostic

approach. Am Fam Physician 1997;56:2253-60.

Simms RW, Goldenberg DL. Symptoms mimicking neurologic

disorders in fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1271-3.

Devigili G, Di Stefano G, Donadio V, Frattale I, Mantovani E,

Nolano M, et al. Clinical criteria and diagnostic assessment of

fibromyalgia: Position statement of the Italian Society of Neurology-

Neuropathic Pain Study Group. Neurol Sci 2023;44:2561-74.

Caro XJ, Galbraith RG, Winter EF. Evidence of peripheral large

nerve involvement in fibromyalgia: A retrospective review of EMG

and nerve conduction findings in 55 FM subjects. Eur J Rheumatol

;5:104-10.

Bromberg MB. An electrodiagnostic approach to the evaluation

of peripheral neuropathies. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am

;24:153-68.

Castelli G, Desai KM, Cantone RE. Peripheral neuropathy:

Evaluation and differential diagnosis. Am Fam Physician

;102:732-9.

Iqbal Z, Azmi S, Yadav R, Ferdousi M, Kumar M, Cuthbertson DJ,

et al. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Epidemiology, diagnosis,

and pharmacotherapy. Clin Ther 2018;40:828-49.

Marquardt RJ, Levin KH. Electrodiagnostic assessment of

radiculopathies. Neurol Clin 2021;39:983-95.

Muzyka IM, Estephan B. Somatosensory evoked potentials. Handb

Clin Neurol 2019;160:523-40.

Yamada T, Yeh M, Kimura J. Fundamental principles of

somatosensory evoked potentials. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am

;15:19-42.

Zambelis T. The usefulness of electrodiagnostic consultation in an

outpatient clinic. J Clin Neurosci 2019;67:59-61.

Prahlow ND, Buschbacher RM. An introduction to

electromyography: An invited review. J Long Term Eff Med

Implants 2003;13:289-307.

Bergquist ER, Hammert WC. Timing and appropriate use of

electrodiagnostic studies. Hand Clin 2013;29:363-70.

Nikolic A, Stevic Z, Peric S, Stojanovic VR, Lavrnic D. Evaluation

of the adequacy of requests for electrodiagnostic examination

in a tertiary referral center. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016;148:

-6.

Zewde YZ, Ayele BA, Belay HD, Oda DM, G/Wolde MA, Gelan YD,

et al. Electrodiagnostic referrals and neuromuscular disease

pattern in East Africa: Experience from a tertiary hospital in

Ethiopia. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2022;7:65-70.

Adebayo PB, Taiwo FT, Owolabi MO. EMG indications and

findings in a sub-Saharan African neurorehabilitation center. Clin

Neurophysiol Pract 2018;3:99-103.

Kvalsund M, Mukomena P, Chidumayo T, Birbeck GL, Andary M,

Horner M, et al. Electrodiagnostic consultations in Zambia:

Referral characteristics and neuromuscular disorders. J Neurol Sci

;397:150-4.

Downloads

Published

16-09-2024

How to Cite

Sharma, A., Chavan, P., & Mansukhani, K. A. (2024). Original Article Electrodiagnostic referrals at a tertiary center: Electrodiagnostic referrals at a tertiary center. Bombay Hospital Journal, 65(4). https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.bhj.162