Prognostic factors determining outcome in Emphysematous Pyelonephritis – A Tertiary Care Centre Experience at Goa Medical College

Authors

  • Madhumohan R. Prabhudesai
  • Rajesh Halarnakar a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:18:"Assistant Lecturer";} https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6632-6279
  • Prashant R. Lawande
  • Antonio De Bossuet Afonso
  • Nilesh Talwadker
  • Pankaj D. Chari
  • Prashant T. N. Mandrekar
  • Veku Gaude
  • Amanda Cardoso

Keywords:

Emphysematous pyelonephritis, nephrectomy, prognostic factors

Abstract

Abstract :

Introduction & objective:

Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is an acute necrotising parenchymal and perirenal infection caused by gas forming organisms commonly occurring in diabetic patients. A discreet evaluation of these patients for specific prognostic factors is extremely important. Objective was to study impact of individual prognostic factors on need for nephrectomy and outcome with regards to mortality in these patients.

Methods:

147 cases of EPN were prospectively studied at Goa Medical College between April 2008 and March 2022. Their mode of presentation, co-morbid conditions, severity of sepsis and 5 prognostic factors (altered sensorium, shock, acidosis, thrombocytopenia and need for dialysis) were analysed. All cases initially underwent DJ stenting/ percutaneous nephrostomy/ percutaneous drain insertion.

Results:

All patients were found to be diabetic. 96 patients had acidosis on presentation, 75 patients presented in shock and 45 in altered sensorium. 66 patients had obstructed system. 30 patients underwent nephrectomy and overall mortality was 17%. Among four prognostic factors found statistically significant, altered sensorium followed by acidosis had the highest Odd’s ratio with maximum impact on the outcome of patients (logistic regression test).

Conclusion:

Among 5 prognostic factors studied, presence of altered sensorium followed by acidosis was found to have maximum impact on the need for nephrectomy and mortality.

In cases of emphysematous pyelonephritis the need for nephrectomy after minimally invasive intervention depends not only on the class of emphysematous pyelonephritis but also on general condition of patient and involvement of other systems in the cascade of sepsis.

References

References

A. R. Pontin, R. D. Barnes, J. Joffe, and D. Kahn, “Emphysematous pyelonephritis in diabetic patients,” British Journal of Urology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 71–74, 1995.

Schultz Jr EH, Klorfein EH. Emphysematous pyelonephritis. J Urol. 1962;87:762---6.

Ouellet LM, Brook MP. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: An emergency indication for the plain abdominal radiograph. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:722-4.

Cook DJ, Achong MR, Dobranowski J. Emphysematous pyelonephritis. Complicated urinary tract infection in diabetes. Diabetes Care 1989;12:229-32.

Ahlering TE, Boyd SD, Hamilton CL, Bragin SD, Chandrasoma PT, Lieskovsky G, et al. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: A 5-year experience with 13 patients. J Urol 1985;134:1086-8.

Somani BK, Nabi G, Thorpe P, Hussey J, Cook J, N’Dow J, et al. Is percutaneous drainage the new gold standard in the management of emphysematous pyelonephritis? Evidence from a systematic review. J Urol. 2008;79:1844---9.

Kelly.H.A, Macallum.W.G. Pneumaturia.JAMA. 1898; 31: 375- 81.

J J Huang, C C Tseng. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: clinicoradiological classification, management, prognosis, and pathogenesis. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Mar 27;160(6):797-805.

Ubee SS, McGlynn L, Fordham M. Emphysematous pyelonephritis. BJU Int. 2011;107:1474---8.

National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39 Suppl. 1:266.

Karthikeyan Aswathaman, Ganesh Gopalakrishnan, et al. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: outcome of conservative management. Urology. 2008 Jun;71(6):1007-9.

Bum Soo Park, Sun-Ju Lee, Youn Wha Kim, Jung Sik Huh, Jin Il Kim, Sung-Goo Chang. Outcome of nephrectomy and kidney-preserving procedures for the treatment of emphysematous pyelonephritis. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(4):332-8.

Mada Alsharif, Abdullah Mohammedkhalil, Basim Alsaywid, Ali Alhazmy, and Salahadin Lamy. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: Is nephrectomy warranted? Urol Ann. 2015 Oct-Dec; 7(4): 494–498.

R Fatima, R Jha, J Muthukrishnan, et al. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: A single center study. Indian J Nephrol. 2013 Mar-Apr; 23(2): 119–124.

D Olvera-Posada, A García-Mora, et al. Prognostic factors in emphysematous pyelonephritis Actas Urol Esp 2013 Apr;37(4):228-32.

Sriram Krishnamoorthy, Alimuddin Zumla et al. Prognostic scoring system and risk stratification in patients with emphysematous pyelonephritis: an 11-year prospective study at a tertiary referral centre. BJU Int 2021 Apr;127(4):418-427

Published

16-09-2024

How to Cite

R. Prabhudesai, M. ., Halarnakar, R., R. Lawande, P., Antonio De Bossuet Afonso, Talwadker, N., Pankaj D. Chari, Prashant T. N. Mandrekar, Veku Gaude, & Amanda Cardoso. (2024). Prognostic factors determining outcome in Emphysematous Pyelonephritis – A Tertiary Care Centre Experience at Goa Medical College. Bombay Hospital Journal, 64(3). Retrieved from https://portal.bhjournal.org/index.php/ins/article/view/77

Issue

Section

Regular Issue Articles